Conservation Reserve Program in Sherman County, Kansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 220
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Sherman County, Kansas totaled $1,374,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Warren L Beek Jr | Cheyenne Wells, CO 80810 | $6,850 |
62 | Vickie Stede | Lakewood, CO 80228 | $6,629 |
63 | Robert D & Joann Frazier Living Trust | Somerton, AZ 85350 | $6,544 |
64 | Alpine Five | Burlington, CO 80807 | $6,460 |
65 | Dennis E House - Dennis E House Revocable Trust | Fort Myers, FL 33901 | $6,320 |
66 | Randy Still | Burdett, KS 67523 | $6,279 |
67 | , | $6,241 | |
68 | Kristi Nelson | Durango, CO 81301 | $6,240 |
69 | Kuhrt Ranch Gen Ptr | Edson, KS 67733 | $6,182 |
70 | Sandra K Wilson Revocable Trust | Bentonville, AR 72712 | $6,092 |
71 | Patrick Berens | Berthoud, CO 80513 | $6,033 |
72 | Scott Alan Jarrett | Goodland, KS 67735 | $5,977 |
73 | Alberta I Hayden Heirs LLC | Goodland, KS 67735 | $5,818 |
74 | , | $5,784 | |
75 | Linda J Franklin Rev Trust | Goodland, KS 67735 | $5,744 |
76 | Gerald S Franklin Jr Rev Trust | Goodland, KS 67735 | $5,744 |
77 | Bradley Hertneky | Burlington, CO 80807 | $5,620 |
78 | Jeffri Rall | Brewster, KS 67732 | $5,414 |
79 | Mike Jarmin | Goodland, KS 67735 | $5,385 |
80 | Douglas E Hall | Goodland, KS 67735 | $5,352 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”