Farm Subsidy information
Sherman County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Sherman County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 934
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sherman County, Kansas totaled $27,607,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Iron Mueller Inc | Cheyenne, WY 82009 | $26,761 |
122 | Rickie L Windell | Kanorado, KS 67741 | $26,474 |
123 | Eddie D Emig Revocable Trust | Goodland, KS 67735 | $25,738 |
124 | Thomas Family Farms LLC | Edson, KS 67733 | $25,255 |
125 | T Bar Ranch Ltd | Devers, TX 77538 | $24,749 |
126 | Cora A House | Goodland, KS 67735 | $24,575 |
127 | Rocking Q Farms Inc | Brewster, KS 67732 | $24,173 |
128 | Daniel Knox | Brewster, KS 67732 | $23,991 |
129 | Loranell Nelson Rvoc Tr | Durango, CO 81301 | $23,694 |
130 | Gregory L Owens | Goodland, KS 67735 | $23,561 |
131 | Matt Ford | Brewster, KS 67732 | $23,283 |
132 | Walter Linthacum | Goodland, KS 67735 | $23,132 |
133 | Henry Nagel Jr - Henry Nagel Jr Rvoc Trust | Kanorado, KS 67741 | $22,566 |
134 | Brandie A Ihrig | Goodland, KS 67735 | $22,507 |
135 | Hazen C Deeds | Goodland, KS 67735 | $22,414 |
136 | Timothy J Wilkening | Goodland, KS 67735 | $22,001 |
137 | Lazy Heart D Ranch Inc | Brewster, KS 67732 | $21,262 |
138 | Michael J Sieck | Edson, KS 67733 | $21,157 |
139 | Gregory Joe Hallagin | Burlington, CO 80807 | $21,024 |
140 | Leo Lynn Ihrig Rev Trust | Goodland, KS 67735 | $20,718 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”