Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program in Sherman County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 260
Recipients of Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program from farms in Sherman County, Kansas totaled $456,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Hard Winter Wheat Incentive Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Western Fertilizer Co | Burlington, CO 80807 | $5,269 |
22 | Melvin Sieck Rev Trust | Goodland, KS 67735 | $4,952 |
23 | Richard A Stefan | Colby, KS 67701 | $4,817 |
24 | Mulch Farms | Burlington, CO 80807 | $4,641 |
25 | Jane Philbrick Trust | Goodland, KS 67735 | $3,786 |
26 | Tim Jaeger | Wichita, KS 67219 | $3,722 |
27 | Donald K Luckert | Brewster, KS 67732 | $3,689 |
28 | Dee Miller | Goodland, KS 67735 | $3,663 |
29 | Jasmin Bair Revocable Trust | Wilson, KS 67490 | $3,374 |
30 | Russell C Briney | Goodland, KS 67735 | $3,249 |
31 | Dave & Betty Jean Schields Jv | Goodland, KS 67735 | $3,056 |
32 | Edwin R Deeds Rev Living Trust | Goodland, KS 67735 | $3,049 |
33 | F & J Farms | Goodland, KS 67735 | $3,034 |
34 | Richard W Townsend Rev Trust | Weskan, KS 67762 | $3,016 |
35 | Neil H Schritter | Kanorado, KS 67741 | $2,990 |
36 | Golden Family Trust | Beverly Hills, CA 90212 | $2,937 |
37 | Scott A Briney Rev Trust | Goodland, KS 67735 | $2,901 |
38 | Matt Ford | Brewster, KS 67732 | $2,879 |
39 | Michael -michael L Rogers Rev Lvg Trust- L Rogers | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $2,736 |
40 | Leonard Farms Inc | Goodland, KS 67735 | $2,640 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”