Total Conservation Programs in Sherman County, Kansas, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 226
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Sherman County, Kansas totaled $1,196,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Steven J Thomeczek | Columbia, MO 65201 | $11,898 |
22 | E Cure Land LLC | Burlington, CO 80807 | $11,237 |
23 | Craig A Good Rev Trust | Olsburg, KS 66520 | $11,108 |
24 | Amy L Good Rev Trust | Olsburg, KS 66520 | $11,108 |
25 | Karla Meissinger | Goodland, KS 67735 | $10,793 |
26 | Danills Family Limited Partnershi | Goodland, KS 67735 | $10,770 |
27 | Richard W Carlson | Solomon, KS 67480 | $10,715 |
28 | Lee Shank Heirs LLC | Goodland, KS 67735 | $10,687 |
29 | Barbara S Wieck | Goodland, KS 67735 | $10,338 |
30 | Foxks Farms LLC | Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 | $10,022 |
31 | Keith L Coon | Goodland, KS 67735 | $9,429 |
32 | Mgs Inc | Goodland, KS 67735 | $9,391 |
33 | Jim & Janice E Flanders Trust | Edson, KS 67733 | $9,271 |
34 | A Lavern Nelson Rev Trust | Durango, CO 81301 | $8,933 |
35 | Peoples Bank & Trust ** | Mcpherson, KS 67460 | $8,498 |
36 | Bernard M Stefan | Goodland, KS 67735 | $8,432 |
37 | Alpine Five | Burlington, CO 80807 | $8,200 |
38 | Melba Curry Rev Trust | Goodland, KS 67735 | $8,168 |
39 | Wendell Curry Rev Trust | Goodland, KS 67735 | $8,168 |
40 | Andersine L Christensen | Rapid City, SD 57701 | $8,079 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”