Farm Subsidy information
Stafford County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Stafford County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 3,922
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Stafford County, Kansas totaled $376,260,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Kyle D Kaiser | St John, KS 67576 | $471,155 |
162 | Kenneth J Miller | Macksville, KS 67557 | $463,888 |
163 | Harold E Tanner | Saint John, KS 67576 | $463,166 |
164 | Roger H Russell | Saint John, KS 67576 | $460,483 |
165 | Ward Beaver Inc | Saint John, KS 67576 | $454,345 |
166 | Howard R Knoche | Stafford, KS 67578 | $450,893 |
167 | Ward Farm & Fertilizer Inc | St John, KS 67576 | $442,797 |
168 | Betty M Hullman | Saint John, KS 67576 | $435,413 |
169 | Jeffrey T Keller | Great Bend, KS 67530 | $435,310 |
170 | Ross E Fisher | St John, KS 67576 | $432,956 |
171 | Suiter Farms LLC | Macksville, KS 67557 | $430,552 |
172 | Kenneth D Dewey | Saint John, KS 67576 | $423,776 |
173 | Andra Bartlett | Saint John, KS 67576 | $418,575 |
174 | Dunn Swine LLC | Saint John, KS 67576 | $417,621 |
175 | M-j Lamb Farms, Inc. | Macksville, KS 67557 | $416,750 |
176 | Daniel G Thompson | Pawnee Rock, KS 67567 | $415,965 |
177 | A C Widener Farms Inc | Hudson, KS 67545 | $413,612 |
178 | Norman K Hildebrand Rev Tr | Stafford, KS 67578 | $407,869 |
179 | Lee Paulsen | Stafford, KS 67578 | $406,993 |
180 | Leah R Chadd | Saint John, KS 67576 | $406,239 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”