Conservation Reserve Program in Stafford County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 381
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Stafford County, Kansas totaled $1,291,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Virginia G Russell | Saint John, KS 67576 | $2,165 |
182 | Lawrence W Taylor | Mcpherson, KS 67460 | $2,165 |
183 | Dale F Hunter Trust | Overland Park, KS 66209 | $2,139 |
184 | Jjh Family LLC | Manhattan, KS 66503 | $2,139 |
185 | Garland Mansel | Saint John, KS 67576 | $2,123 |
186 | Jon C Mansel | Manhattan, KS 66502 | $2,123 |
187 | Jenny Lynn Farms Ltd | Saint John, KS 67576 | $2,086 |
188 | Vance A Fisher | St John, KS 67576 | $2,057 |
189 | Alfrada F Bock Gst Trust | Belpre, KS 67519 | $2,034 |
190 | James R Dickson | Stafford, KS 67578 | $2,000 |
191 | Stafford Lake Incorporated | Stafford, KS 67578 | $1,990 |
192 | Ethelmae Page Irr Trust | Macksville, KS 67557 | $1,963 |
193 | Michael E Christie | Stafford, KS 67578 | $1,943 |
194 | David Mccandless | Saint John, KS 67576 | $1,892 |
195 | Tla Enterprises Inc | Stafford, KS 67578 | $1,884 |
196 | Hildebrand Brothers | Stafford, KS 67578 | $1,846 |
197 | Patrick L Dale | Scottsdale, AZ 85259 | $1,843 |
198 | James E Dale | Golden, CO 80403 | $1,842 |
199 | Larry D Hartsell | New York, NY 10023 | $1,842 |
200 | Mary F Wichman | Dublin, OH 43016 | $1,842 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”