Total Conservation Programs in Stanton County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 279
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Stanton County, Kansas totaled $2,034,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Jill Lashmet | Eaton, CO 80615 | $7,022 |
102 | Betty P Wilkerson | Johnson, KS 67855 | $6,947 |
103 | Mhr Farms LLC | Montrose, CO 81401 | $6,627 |
104 | Mike Smith - Mike Smith Investments LLC | Johnson, KS 67855 | $6,578 |
105 | Myrna Barnes | Upland, CA 91784 | $6,495 |
106 | John Smith-john D & Carolyn K Smith Liv Trust | Johnson, KS 67855 | $6,455 |
107 | Beery/bearce-beery Family Rev Tr | Oakland, CA 94619 | $6,411 |
108 | Jay Townsend | Pueblo West, CO 81007 | $6,204 |
109 | Jesus M Tarin | Johnson, KS 67855 | $6,049 |
110 | Lewis Michael Toole | Manter, KS 67862 | $5,954 |
111 | Trio LLC | Colby, KS 67701 | $5,724 |
112 | Cheatham--kilgore Farms LLC | Mcpherson, KS 67460 | $5,626 |
113 | Maxine L Hines | Coolidge, KS 67836 | $5,378 |
114 | Catherine Diane Williamson | Modesto, CA 95354 | $5,308 |
115 | Bailey Family Trust | Fort Collins, CO 80528 | $5,261 |
116 | Kilgore Farms LLC | Kechi, KS 67067 | $5,222 |
117 | First National Bank Of Syracuse ** | Johnson, KS 67855 | $5,218 |
118 | Shirley Boterf | East Hampton, NY 11937 | $5,153 |
119 | Wanda Batterton | Johnson, KS 67855 | $5,125 |
120 | William J Leiker | Holly, CO 81047 | $5,109 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”