Total Conservation Programs in Stanton County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 279
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Stanton County, Kansas totaled $2,034,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Judith J Whipple | Johnson, KS 67855 | $3,774 |
162 | Dorothy M Dody | Fort Collins, CO 80528 | $3,748 |
163 | Robert L Dody Rev Tr | Fort Collins, CO 80528 | $3,748 |
164 | Cheryl A Adams | Johnson, KS 67855 | $3,742 |
165 | Troy Adams | Johnson, KS 67855 | $3,742 |
166 | Charles D Wilkerson | Johnson, KS 67855 | $3,733 |
167 | Cesar Garcia | Ulysses, KS 67880 | $3,700 |
168 | Patricia A Lane | Johnson, KS 67855 | $3,682 |
169 | Mona L Winger Rev Trust | Johnson, KS 67855 | $3,666 |
170 | James L Carrithers | Windom, KS 67491 | $3,583 |
171 | Lois Smith-lois Smith Rev Trust | Johnson, KS 67855 | $3,506 |
172 | J Darlene Davis | Holly, CO 81047 | $3,505 |
173 | Grady V Cook Estate | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $3,418 |
174 | Rita K Nelson | Johnson, KS 67855 | $3,281 |
175 | Lori Mitchell | Manhattan, KS 66503 | $3,280 |
176 | Alfred J Collingwood | Johnson, KS 67855 | $3,280 |
177 | Douglas M Suiter & Patricia L Suiter Rev Trust | Tempe, AZ 85282 | $3,207 |
178 | Feiertag Farms Lc | Wichita, KS 67230 | $3,167 |
179 | Larren Holdren | Casper, WY 82609 | $3,120 |
180 | Grady M Cook | Syracuse, KS 67878 | $3,120 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”