Farm Subsidy information
Stanton County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Stanton County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,325
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Stanton County, Kansas totaled $488,016,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Winger Farms | Johnson, KS 67855 | $7,287,007 |
2 | 5 Star Farms | Johnson, KS 67855 | $6,192,584 |
3 | Nairn & Nairn Farms | Johnson, KS 67855 | $5,058,784 |
4 | M & G Farms | Johnson, KS 67855 | $5,051,937 |
5 | Double Diamond Ag | Johnson, KS 67855 | $4,106,266 |
6 | Winsome Farms Gp | Johnson, KS 67855 | $4,096,539 |
7 | C-l Farms | Johnson, KS 67855 | $4,023,617 |
8 | Canny Farms | Johnson, KS 67855 | $3,990,302 |
9 | Parks Brothers | Johnson, KS 67855 | $3,950,539 |
10 | David T Walker | Johnson, KS 67855 | $3,124,201 |
11 | Abc Farms Inc | Manter, KS 67862 | $3,081,315 |
12 | Scott Farms | Johnson, KS 67855 | $2,993,873 |
13 | Bi-state Farms | Johnson, KS 67855 | $2,860,368 |
14 | Nic II Farms | Johnson, KS 67855 | $2,763,646 |
15 | Seyb Farm Partnership | Johnson, KS 67855 | $2,721,862 |
16 | Triple J | Johnson, KS 67855 | $2,649,793 |
17 | Josserand Farms, Inc | Johnson, KS 67855 | $2,449,309 |
18 | Western Production Company | Johnson, KS 67855 | $2,220,160 |
19 | Floyd Cattle Co | Johnson, KS 67855 | $2,212,437 |
20 | Steve-steve Arnold Rev Trust Arnold | Johnson, KS 67855 | $2,204,655 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>