Total Conservation Programs in Stevens County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 423
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Stevens County, Kansas totaled $1,889,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Linda Sheffield | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $10,701 |
42 | Jan Leonard | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $10,667 |
43 | Donald Dee Knier Sr Living Trust- Donald Dee Knier | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $10,419 |
44 | Triple S Feeders | Moscow, KS 67952 | $10,351 |
45 | Janet S Biernacki | Plains, KS 67869 | $10,107 |
46 | Dkb Farms LLC | Andover, MN 55304 | $9,994 |
47 | Dkb Farms LLC | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $9,994 |
48 | John R Plank & Joyce M Plank Irr Tr | Platte City, MO 64079 | $9,876 |
49 | Staci L Garrett | Great Bend, KS 67530 | $9,865 |
50 | Staats Farms LLC | Ulysses, KS 67880 | $9,786 |
51 | R & L Walkemeyer Properties Lp | La Habra, CA 90631 | $9,208 |
52 | Eldon Eugene Leonard | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $9,205 |
53 | Dawn Jackson | Norman, OK 73026 | $9,198 |
54 | Fenceline Farms LLC | Albuquerque, NM 87108 | $9,055 |
55 | Oo7 Ranch LLC | Wichita, KS 67230 | $8,962 |
56 | Joe D Thompson | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $8,883 |
57 | Ralph D Or Norma Stoddard Wros | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $8,825 |
58 | Charlotte Breeding | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $8,720 |
59 | Gary E & Caree M Schmidt Wros | Oklahoma City, OK 73131 | $8,531 |
60 | Walter W Beesley Jr | Hugoton, KS 67951 | $8,508 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”