Conservation Reserve Program in Sumner County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 251
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Sumner County, Kansas totaled $196,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Steven Andrew Wolf | Wynnewood, OK 73098 | $1,393 |
42 | Daniel A And Sheila H Forbes Trust | Stillwater, OK 74074 | $1,382 |
43 | Carol E Pearce | Argonia, KS 67004 | $1,374 |
44 | Jim Stuhlsatz | Mayfield, KS 67103 | $1,349 |
45 | Billy Joe & Maxine Holden Rev Trust | Argonia, KS 67004 | $1,343 |
46 | Crowe Family 2005 Trust | Redding, CA 96003 | $1,252 |
47 | Meta Louise Crawford Family Trust | Wellington, KS 67152 | $1,249 |
48 | Gary Littlejohn | Wichita, KS 67204 | $1,213 |
49 | Travis J Littlejohn | Wichita, KS 67205 | $1,213 |
50 | Ray D Jones | Wichita, KS 67209 | $1,213 |
51 | Stephen J Lange | Conway Springs, KS 67031 | $1,191 |
52 | Jeff M Lange Rev Trust | Wichita, KS 67216 | $1,136 |
53 | Delbert Larson Test Trust | Caldwell, KS 67022 | $1,082 |
54 | Mark Urban | Wellington, KS 67152 | $1,055 |
55 | Orie Marshall Love | Wellington, KS 67152 | $1,050 |
56 | John T Timmerman | South Haven, KS 67140 | $981 |
57 | Anne Olmstead Rush | Conway Springs, KS 67031 | $967 |
58 | E W Stalnaker Rev Trust | Leavenworth, KS 66048 | $934 |
59 | Link Cotham-link And Teena Cotham Rev Liv Tr | Norman, OK 73072 | $897 |
60 | Gwendolyn F Slack | Wellington, KS 67152 | $878 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”