Conservation Reserve Program in Trego County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 312
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Trego County, Kansas totaled $1,073,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Donita L Boles | Lake Havasu City, AZ 86404 | $3,115 |
102 | Neil Baker | Scott City, KS 67871 | $3,097 |
103 | Gerald Riedel | Wakeeney, KS 67672 | $3,093 |
104 | Charles R Rhoades | Wakeeney, KS 67672 | $3,091 |
105 | Crystal A Schneider | Wakeeney, KS 67672 | $3,047 |
106 | Wente Brothers Partnership | Hays, KS 67601 | $3,010 |
107 | Nicholas P Schroeder | Wakeeney, KS 67672 | $2,944 |
108 | Timothy Miller- Ta Miller Revocable Trust | Wakeeney, KS 67672 | $2,941 |
109 | Oren Windholz | Hays, KS 67601 | $2,914 |
110 | Keith Deines-keith M. Deines Revocable Trust | Ransom, KS 67572 | $2,832 |
111 | Frank Schwarzenberger | Phillipsburg, KS 67661 | $2,803 |
112 | Brian J Walt | Collyer, KS 67631 | $2,802 |
113 | Doug And Laura Malsam Irrevocable Farm Trust | Wakeeney, KS 67672 | $2,792 |
114 | Richard James Hilgers | Ogallah, KS 67656 | $2,731 |
115 | Diane D Townsend Horner Rev Trust | Windsor, CO 80550 | $2,687 |
116 | Larry Pearson | Wakeeney, KS 67672 | $2,664 |
117 | Max Weissbeck | Collyer, KS 67631 | $2,576 |
118 | Norbert Armbruster | Ellis, KS 67637 | $2,574 |
119 | Edward H Stehno Rev Liv Tr | Hays, KS 67601 | $2,536 |
120 | Kathryn Fossett | Quinter, KS 67752 | $2,496 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”