Farm Subsidy information
Trego County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Trego County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 830
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Trego County, Kansas totaled $11,423,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Connie Albin | Quinter, KS 67752 | $12,230 |
122 | Lucas J Meiar | Wakeeney, KS 67672 | $12,174 |
123 | George Taulman | Taos, NM 87571 | $12,031 |
124 | Lance D Kinderknecht | Wakeeney, KS 67672 | $11,710 |
125 | Ryan Day | Wakeeney, KS 67672 | $11,699 |
126 | Julius Henning | Wakeeney, KS 67672 | $11,683 |
127 | Max J Atwood | Wakeeney, KS 67672 | $11,589 |
128 | Kenneth Rohr Trust | Hays, KS 67601 | $11,565 |
129 | Brayden Lane Werth | Ogallah, KS 67656 | $11,549 |
130 | Allen Montgomery | Ransom, KS 67572 | $11,264 |
131 | Wilda Offutt Rev Trust | Utica, KS 67584 | $11,252 |
132 | Luke T Parke | Hays, KS 67601 | $11,165 |
133 | J & L Land & Cattle Co Of Ks | Hays, KS 67601 | $11,089 |
134 | A & D Windholz Living Trust | Ogallah, KS 67656 | $10,996 |
135 | Melvin - Melvin&marian Fabrizius Liv Tr R Fabriziu | Wakeeney, KS 67672 | $10,994 |
136 | Shelly-shelly R Fuchs Living Trust Fuchs | Ellis, KS 67637 | $10,847 |
137 | Michael B Deines | Scott City, KS 67871 | $10,791 |
138 | Merlin R Deines | Wakeeney, KS 67672 | $10,732 |
139 | Ron J Ochs Living Trust | Quinter, KS 67752 | $10,724 |
140 | Gerald D Honas Rev Trust | Wichita, KS 67223 | $10,694 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”