Conservation Reserve Program in Trego County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 312
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Trego County, Kansas totaled $1,073,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Patricia G Renner Gst Ua 4-23-01 | Salina, KS 67402 | $1,506 |
162 | Laurie R Gross Gst Ua 4-23-01 | Salina, KS 67402 | $1,505 |
163 | Mary Gay Menscer | Hope Mills, NC 28348 | $1,471 |
164 | Reid Werth | Quinter, KS 67752 | $1,465 |
165 | Fowl Play Farms Inc | Quinter, KS 67752 | $1,410 |
166 | Lavern Walt | Collyer, KS 67631 | $1,409 |
167 | Keevin C Newcomer | Ogallah, KS 67656 | $1,401 |
168 | Harold & Gwen Honas Trust | Ellis, KS 67637 | $1,365 |
169 | George R Delaney | Wakeeney, KS 67672 | $1,358 |
170 | Donald Ziegler | Winfield, KS 67156 | $1,331 |
171 | Custer Farms LLC | Hays, KS 67601 | $1,293 |
172 | Eric Shuman | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $1,288 |
173 | Glen Sander | Great Bend, KS 67530 | $1,282 |
174 | Jak Family, LLC | St George, KS 66535 | $1,252 |
175 | Leroy Steckline | Ogallah, KS 67656 | $1,249 |
176 | Robert J Parke Family Trust | Wakeeney, KS 67672 | $1,232 |
177 | Rooster Retreat LLC | Hays, KS 67601 | $1,228 |
178 | Randall Scott Honas | Ellis, KS 67637 | $1,194 |
179 | Jeffery Dean Schneider | Mcpherson, KS 67460 | $1,165 |
180 | Jason Scott Schneider | Hays, KS 67601 | $1,165 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”