Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Wabaunsee County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 265
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Wabaunsee County, Kansas totaled $3,488,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Donald J Glotzbach And Lila M Glotzbach Rev Trust | Paxico, KS 66526 | $2,412 |
162 | Walter - Danville Weaver Trust | Topeka, KS 66604 | $2,411 |
163 | Chauncey Hewes | Maple Hill, KS 66507 | $2,361 |
164 | Lela Riley | Alma, KS 66401 | $2,359 |
165 | Jim Hinck | Eskridge, KS 66423 | $2,311 |
166 | Jacob L Gleason | Maple Hill, KS 66507 | $2,304 |
167 | Verne W Converse Family Trust | Manhattan, KS 66503 | $2,260 |
168 | Michael Lett | Saint Marys, KS 66536 | $2,137 |
169 | Daniel J Kraus | Paxico, KS 66526 | $2,116 |
170 | Neale Anderson | Belvue, KS 66407 | $2,079 |
171 | Cleo A Schultz Revocable Trust-cleo Schultz | Alma, KS 66401 | $2,066 |
172 | Donald H Heigert | Paxico, KS 66526 | $2,010 |
173 | Larry Thierer | Alma, KS 66401 | $2,003 |
174 | Barbara H Sommer | Council Grove, KS 66846 | $1,992 |
175 | James M Warren Trust | Copley, OH 44321 | $1,958 |
176 | Joseph L Holenbeck | Alma, KS 66401 | $1,947 |
177 | Mcmaster Farm | Cascade, CO 80809 | $1,904 |
178 | Judith Ellis - Judith Ellis Rev T | Maple Hill, KS 66507 | $1,881 |
179 | Gary Schuetz | Paxico, KS 66526 | $1,826 |
180 | Emerson D Dabney | Tecumseh, KS 66542 | $1,813 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”