Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Wabaunsee County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 265
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Wabaunsee County, Kansas totaled $3,488,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lett Farms Inc | Saint Marys, KS 66536 | $24,902 |
42 | Eddy H Palenske | Wamego, KS 66547 | $24,498 |
43 | Jay Wheeler | Maple Hill, KS 66507 | $23,792 |
44 | Everette C Thomas | Harveyville, KS 66431 | $22,504 |
45 | Wilfred Joseph Hund | Paxico, KS 66526 | $21,467 |
46 | Frey Jersey Farm | Wamego, KS 66547 | $21,145 |
47 | Lauren Ashburn | Alta Vista, KS 66834 | $21,032 |
48 | Rusty Mcdiffett | Alma, KS 66401 | $21,030 |
49 | Keith Schultz | Alma, KS 66401 | $20,588 |
50 | Lawrence H & Gertrude A Schweir Rev Trust | Belvue, KS 66407 | $20,444 |
51 | Mary R Buchmann Trust | Leawood, KS 66209 | $20,074 |
52 | Andie Tranter | Harveyville, KS 66431 | $20,056 |
53 | William O Mahoney | Council Grove, KS 66846 | $19,681 |
54 | Matthew Anderson | Alma, KS 66401 | $19,456 |
55 | Brethour Ranch LLC | Maple Hill, KS 66507 | $19,405 |
56 | Rodney G Blythe | Maple Hill, KS 66507 | $18,800 |
57 | Glen D Swartz | Alta Vista, KS 66834 | $18,700 |
58 | Bryan Poppelreiter | Maple Hill, KS 66507 | $18,588 |
59 | Adam W Hinck | Eskridge, KS 66423 | $18,230 |
60 | Mayer Ranch LLC | Alta Vista, KS 66834 | $17,874 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”