Market Loss Assistance Program in Wallace County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 718
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Wallace County, Kansas totaled $12,648,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Fotopoulos Farms Inc | Dallas, TX 75248 | $74,249 |
42 | R & B Farms | Goodland, KS 67735 | $74,230 |
43 | Stan & Jan Sommerfeld Inc | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $74,200 |
44 | Mai Farms Inc | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $73,802 |
45 | The Larson Family Rev Trust | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $72,680 |
46 | Popp Farms | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $72,362 |
47 | Sexson Farms | Weskan, KS 67762 | $71,450 |
48 | Kevin Young Trust No 1 | Tribune, KS 67879 | $71,434 |
49 | Mark Unruh | Surprise, AZ 85374 | $71,414 |
50 | Vernon G Fischer | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $71,123 |
51 | Dennis J Smith | Weskan, KS 67762 | $70,793 |
52 | Leona Louise Buell | Wallace, KS 67761 | $70,514 |
53 | Dennis Wayne Collins | Wallace, KS 67761 | $68,419 |
54 | Donald E Pletcher | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $67,084 |
55 | Okeson Farms | Weskan, KS 67762 | $67,050 |
56 | Bonnie E Hibbert | Garden City, KS 67846 | $65,672 |
57 | Purvis L P | Weskan, KS 67762 | $65,608 |
58 | Darrel - D Schemm Li D Schemm | Wallace, KS 67761 | $65,318 |
59 | Popp | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $65,196 |
60 | Dean Schemm Trust | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $64,986 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”