Counter Cyclical Program in Wallace County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 501
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Wallace County, Kansas totaled $3,611,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Leonard Unruh | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $8,171 |
102 | Jo Anne Unruh | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $8,171 |
103 | Lilly Fotopoulos | Dallas, TX 75248 | $8,050 |
104 | Darrel - D Schemm Li D Schemm | Wallace, KS 67761 | $7,842 |
105 | Edward M & Imogene A Waugh Liv Tr | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $7,515 |
106 | Ray Welsh Trust No 1 | Weskan, KS 67762 | $7,255 |
107 | Bradley Koehn | Scott City, KS 67871 | $7,148 |
108 | Karlan Koehn | Marienthal, KS 67863 | $7,148 |
109 | Lonnie Koehn | Marienthal, KS 67863 | $7,148 |
110 | Frances A Reiss Living Trust | Weskan, KS 67762 | $6,654 |
111 | Darrel O Cloyd Rev Inter Vivos Trust | Colwich, KS 67030 | $6,649 |
112 | John E Klinge | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $6,635 |
113 | Lonnie P Charles | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $6,533 |
114 | Charles Schulte | Bethune, CO 80805 | $6,472 |
115 | Willoway Farms Inc | Phoenix, AZ 85069 | $6,367 |
116 | Donald T Okeson | Weskan, KS 67762 | $6,295 |
117 | Blaine-blaine & Tama Rohn | Hutchinson, KS 67502 | $6,277 |
118 | David Sexson | Weskan, KS 67762 | $6,202 |
119 | Billy W Armstrong Rev Trust Inter | Quinter, KS 67752 | $6,136 |
120 | Coldwater Interest Lp | Garden City, KS 67846 | $5,775 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”