Total Conservation Programs in Wallace County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 865
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Wallace County, Kansas totaled $58,046,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Vernon D Schemm Trust | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $157,933 |
102 | S L Daily | Wallace, KS 67761 | $156,211 |
103 | Tony Stewart | Franklin Springs, GA 30639 | $155,068 |
104 | Annie M Welch | Broomfield, CO 80021 | $152,460 |
105 | Rocking Chair Farms Inc | Goodland, KS 67735 | $152,409 |
106 | Orie N Ritter Rev Trust | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $151,320 |
107 | Stan Sommerfeld | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $151,179 |
108 | Mary L Larson | Topeka, KS 66611 | $150,038 |
109 | Brian Wayne Bellamy | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $149,756 |
110 | Randy Joe Bellamy | Goodland, KS 67735 | $149,756 |
111 | Leah Belle Mead | Wichita, KS 67212 | $148,090 |
112 | Joe Bellamy | Elwood, NE 68937 | $146,755 |
113 | John M Akers | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $146,182 |
114 | Fry Family Limited Partnership | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $146,136 |
115 | Gary Haislip | Wallace, KS 67761 | $144,806 |
116 | Paul Hughes | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $140,860 |
117 | Margaret Hoss | Wallace, KS 67761 | $140,825 |
118 | D & R Cattle Co | Holly, CO 81047 | $139,574 |
119 | Margaret Ann Asher | Great Bend, KS 67530 | $133,842 |
120 | Mckinney Farms | Weskan, KS 67762 | $132,507 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”