Farm Subsidy information
Washington County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Washington County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,249
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Washington County, Kansas totaled $17,193,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Johnnie K Rothlisberger | Barnes, KS 66933 | $33,003 |
62 | Kladc Farming Inc | Hanover, KS 66945 | $32,918 |
63 | Thomas L Erickson | Clifton, KS 66937 | $32,670 |
64 | Randy And Michelle Bruna Revocable Trust-randy Bru | Hanover, KS 66945 | $32,172 |
65 | Double J Enterprises LLC | Hanover, KS 66945 | $31,988 |
66 | Steven B Zenger | Haddam, KS 66944 | $31,624 |
67 | Greg Cooney | Barnes, KS 66933 | $31,518 |
68 | L & C Farms Inc | Barnes, KS 66933 | $31,070 |
69 | Michael Rencin | Barnes, KS 66933 | $31,057 |
70 | David L Jueneman | Washington, KS 66968 | $30,271 |
71 | Curtis Stamm | Washington, KS 66968 | $30,242 |
72 | Jay Scott Jueneman | Hanover, KS 66945 | $29,900 |
73 | Todd L Jueneman | Hanover, KS 66945 | $29,892 |
74 | Welch Brothers | Haddam, KS 66944 | $29,707 |
75 | Greg Diederich | Greenleaf, KS 66943 | $29,642 |
76 | Tony Van Campen-tony G And Lauri D Van Campen Revo | Clifton, KS 66937 | $29,274 |
77 | Shorney Trust | Lees Summit, MO 64064 | $28,596 |
78 | John And Ramona Hiesterman Revocable Trust-john Hi | Washington, KS 66968 | $28,555 |
79 | Chris Hansen | Greenleaf, KS 66943 | $28,519 |
80 | Jeremy Olson | Palmer, KS 66962 | $28,308 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”