Deficiency Payment in Washington County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,387
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Washington County, Kansas totaled $1,938,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Richard Tuma Revocable Trust | Morrowville, KS 66958 | $10,162 |
22 | Lee W Pifer Revocable Trust-lee Pifer | Washington, KS 66968 | $10,008 |
23 | Dean Vathauer Rev Trust | Barnes, KS 66933 | $9,770 |
24 | K C Pork Inc | Clifton, KS 66937 | $9,610 |
25 | Delwin W And Lois E Bott Revocabl | Palmer, KS 66962 | $9,299 |
26 | Ronald H And Kathleen A Bott Revo | Palmer, KS 66962 | $9,040 |
27 | Arbuthnot Farms Inc | Mahaska, KS 66955 | $9,021 |
28 | Mueller Farms Inc | Hanover, KS 66945 | $8,869 |
29 | Lyle Hennerberg Rev Family Trust | Hollenberg, KS 66946 | $8,728 |
30 | Joe B Bruna Revocable Trust | Hanover, KS 66945 | $8,408 |
31 | Dale And Gloria Bruna Trust-dale Bruna | Hanover, KS 66945 | $8,402 |
32 | Firman Brandt | Linn, KS 66953 | $8,375 |
33 | Calvin And Rhea Wilgers Revocabl | Linn, KS 66953 | $8,082 |
34 | Valley View Ranch Inc | Clifton, KS 66937 | $7,962 |
35 | Jerry Burger Inc | Palmer, KS 66962 | $7,841 |
36 | Kruse Brothers | Hanover, KS 66945 | $7,598 |
37 | Dewayne A Rose | Mahaska, KS 66955 | $7,588 |
38 | Pannbacker Farm Inc | Washington, KS 66968 | $7,469 |
39 | Norman Nelson | Clifton, KS 66937 | $7,301 |
40 | Daryl D Bott | Linn, KS 66953 | $7,137 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”