Market Gains in Washington County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 183
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Washington County, Kansas totaled $1,929,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Leiszler Grain | Clifton, KS 66937 | $28,000 |
22 | J & J Family Trust | Barnes, KS 66933 | $27,742 |
23 | Donald And Barbara Peterson Revocable Trust-donald | Clifton, KS 66937 | $27,471 |
24 | Dean-dean And Connie L Herrs | Linn, KS 66953 | $25,875 |
25 | P&b Farms Inc | Greenleaf, KS 66943 | $25,090 |
26 | Dewayne A Rose | Mahaska, KS 66955 | $22,756 |
27 | Limestone Valley Stock Farm | Hanover, KS 66945 | $19,847 |
28 | Robert D Kern Revocable Trust | Washington, KS 66968 | $18,987 |
29 | Lavern Stigge | Washington, KS 66968 | $18,046 |
30 | A & L Inc | Barnes, KS 66933 | $17,215 |
31 | Kruse Brothers | Hanover, KS 66945 | $16,852 |
32 | Gerald J Long Revocable Trust-gerald Long | Clifton, KS 66937 | $15,827 |
33 | Frager Farms Ptns | Morrowville, KS 66958 | $15,660 |
34 | John And Ramona Hiesterman Revocable Trust-john Hi | Washington, KS 66968 | $14,583 |
35 | Gary Stamm | Washington, KS 66968 | $14,499 |
36 | Delwin W And Lois E Bott Revocabl | Palmer, KS 66962 | $13,911 |
37 | Douglas A Bott | Palmer, KS 66962 | $13,845 |
38 | Daryl D Bott | Linn, KS 66953 | $13,845 |
39 | Robert L Helms | Linn, KS 66953 | $13,518 |
40 | Bryce L Heck | Linn, KS 66953 | $13,388 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”