Conservation Reserve Program in Wichita County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 732
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Wichita County, Kansas totaled $42,367,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Daniel Geyer -daniel & Carla Geyer Living Trust | Leoti, KS 67861 | $178,280 |
62 | Kreutzer Brothers LLC | Wichita, KS 67210 | $178,071 |
63 | Kenneth A Warrington | Conway Springs, KS 67031 | $177,793 |
64 | Lee Oldham Trust No 1 | Leoti, KS 67861 | $177,433 |
65 | Virginia Lee | Garden City, KS 67846 | $176,394 |
66 | Mary Ann Mott | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $174,270 |
67 | Charles R Whitham | Leoti, KS 67861 | $173,870 |
68 | Francis J Schmitz Trust | College Station, TX 77845 | $173,433 |
69 | Bridges Family Farms Inc | Camarillo, CA 93010 | $172,513 |
70 | Jerry Spradling | Leoti, KS 67861 | $172,447 |
71 | Pearl J Hunt | Leoti, KS 67861 | $163,547 |
72 | G & G Roberts | Leoti, KS 67861 | $159,644 |
73 | Lavern Rapier | Goddard, KS 67052 | $159,434 |
74 | Elmer Ridder | Leoti, KS 67861 | $159,255 |
75 | Leonard Rewerts | Olathe, KS 66062 | $153,302 |
76 | John- John And Rita Simons Rvc Trust Simons | Marienthal, KS 67863 | $151,899 |
77 | Owens Trust | Leoti, KS 67861 | $151,850 |
78 | Major Graff | Marienthal, KS 67863 | $151,366 |
79 | Grant Nokes | Elmer, OK 73539 | $149,609 |
80 | Keith Uhland - Uhland Rev Trust | Wilmington, DE 19803 | $148,306 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”