Farm Subsidy information
Wilson County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Wilson County, Kansas, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 534
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Wilson County, Kansas totaled $11,126,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | R Puckett Farms Inc | Fredonia, KS 66736 | $79,054 |
22 | Millertime Farms Inc | Benedict, KS 66714 | $77,412 |
23 | Debbie Bradford | Chanute, KS 66720 | $77,228 |
24 | Gudde Farms Inc | Neodesha, KS 66757 | $76,617 |
25 | Seller Drycreek Farms, LLC | Neodesha, KS 66757 | $74,703 |
26 | Schultz Family Ag LLC | Fredonia, KS 66736 | $71,723 |
27 | R Glen Baker | Fredonia, KS 66736 | $71,342 |
28 | William R Thorsell | Chanute, KS 66720 | $67,316 |
29 | Billy Ecton Jr | Fall River, KS 67047 | $66,338 |
30 | Cedar Creek Farms LLC | Chanute, KS 66720 | $65,063 |
31 | Seller Farms, LLC | Neodesha, KS 66757 | $64,195 |
32 | Justin Michael Newland | Neodesha, KS 66757 | $64,102 |
33 | Jerry Guenther | Benedict, KS 66714 | $62,058 |
34 | Cameron Lee Jantz | Fredonia, KS 66736 | $61,910 |
35 | Nathan Miller | Fredonia, KS 66736 | $61,230 |
36 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $59,253 |
37 | Bradley Duane Mcvey | Fredonia, KS 66736 | $57,297 |
38 | Bradford Grain Co Inc | Chanute, KS 66720 | $57,287 |
39 | Jared Lane Schultz | Fredonia, KS 66736 | $56,536 |
40 | Roy Varner | Benedict, KS 66714 | $55,962 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”