Conservation Reserve Program in Wilson County, Kansas, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 71
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Wilson County, Kansas totaled $95,012 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Herbert E And Ethel M Huser Livin | Fredonia, KS 66736 | $1,604 |
22 | Pleasant Valley Inc | Fredonia, KS 66736 | $1,352 |
23 | Lewis Pierce | Altoona, KS 66710 | $1,215 |
24 | Martin Underwood | Carlisle, AR 72024 | $1,166 |
25 | Michael Capps | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $1,166 |
26 | Charles A James And Karen S Jame | Wichita, KS 67235 | $1,163 |
27 | Rick Carlson | Chanute, KS 66720 | $1,160 |
28 | Arline Guenther | Benedict, KS 66714 | $1,128 |
29 | Turner Legacy Investments LLC | Plano, TX 75093 | $988 |
30 | Dale Nelson | Topeka, KS 66604 | $929 |
31 | Michael Olson | Buffalo, KS 66717 | $910 |
32 | Gary L Vanhoozer | Buffalo, KS 66717 | $873 |
33 | Jacob Smith | Fredonia, KS 66736 | $840 |
34 | William C & Betty J Follmer Irrev Trust | Independence, KS 67301 | $836 |
35 | Gary D & Debra A Willhite Joint Rev Trust | El Dorado, KS 67042 | $785 |
36 | E Wayne & Eugena L Willhite Rev Lvg Trust | Winfield, KS 67156 | $785 |
37 | Lela Black | Fredonia, KS 66736 | $613 |
38 | Lloyd W Kebert And Carol D Kebert Living Trust | Fredonia, KS 66736 | $564 |
39 | Joe N & Frances M Schoenecker Rev | Wichita, KS 67204 | $552 |
40 | David A Bosch | Neodesha, KS 66757 | $521 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”