Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Calloway County, Kentucky, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 118
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Calloway County, Kentucky totaled $1,767,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Monica Wilson | Murray, KY 42071 | $7,387 |
42 | Edward Max Gore | Benton, KY 42025 | $7,211 |
43 | William R Meador | New Concord, KY 42076 | $5,070 |
44 | Benjamin D Bell | Murray, KY 42071 | $4,872 |
45 | The Ella Van Tidwell Trust | Jupiter, FL 33458 | $3,968 |
46 | Crystal Parks | Murray, KY 42071 | $3,571 |
47 | Maxine Houston | Murray, KY 42071 | $3,465 |
48 | Tony G Raspberry | Hazel, KY 42049 | $3,277 |
49 | Kate Eldridge | Murray, KY 42071 | $3,070 |
50 | Herndon Farms | Hazel, KY 42049 | $3,005 |
51 | Johnny Underwood | Hazel, KY 42049 | $2,555 |
52 | Huel West Jr | Puryear, TN 38251 | $2,550 |
53 | Billy Joe Stubblefield | Murray, KY 42071 | $2,533 |
54 | Howell R Clark | Murray, KY 42071 | $2,475 |
55 | John Howard Dunn | Covington, GA 30014 | $2,428 |
56 | Charles H Tidwell | Hazel, KY 42049 | $2,364 |
57 | Stubblefield Farm LLC | Murray, KY 42071 | $2,154 |
58 | James E Trevathan | Murray, KY 42071 | $2,124 |
59 | Jay Anthony Housden | Murray, KY 42071 | $2,109 |
60 | Jimmy H Ford | Murray, KY 42071 | $1,969 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”