Total Commodity Programs in Daviess County, Kentucky, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 4,604
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Daviess County, Kentucky totaled $152,551,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Gilles Farms LLC | Owensboro, KY 42301 | $304,720 |
122 | G A Leet And Son | Utica, KY 42376 | $304,317 |
123 | Steve Simmons | Owensboro, KY 42301 | $302,508 |
124 | Habit Hill Farms LLC | Philpot, KY 42366 | $301,010 |
125 | Flat Lick Creek Farms Inc | Owensboro, KY 42301 | $294,735 |
126 | Anthony J Mccarty | Kimberly, WI 54136 | $289,053 |
127 | Donald Catron | Owensboro, KY 42301 | $286,768 |
128 | Beyke Farms | Whitesville, KY 42378 | $286,182 |
129 | Sand Trace Farms Inc | Owensboro, KY 42301 | $282,759 |
130 | Ron Wethington | Utica, KY 42376 | $281,440 |
131 | Keith Riney | Owensboro, KY 42301 | $277,192 |
132 | James Randahl Stephen | Owensboro, KY 42301 | $276,439 |
133 | Gary Murphy Farms LLC | Owensboro, KY 42301 | $276,021 |
134 | James R Jones | Philpot, KY 42366 | $270,531 |
135 | James G Pantle | Owensboro, KY 42303 | $270,477 |
136 | Ctc Investments LLC | Owensboro, KY 42301 | $266,220 |
137 | Cecil Tobacco Company | Owensboro, KY 42301 | $260,432 |
138 | Harold L Ebelhar | Owensboro, KY 42301 | $258,740 |
139 | Royce Mccormick Jr | Utica, KY 42376 | $258,690 |
140 | M J Estes | Maceo, KY 42355 | $257,694 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”