Farm Subsidy information
Garrard County, Kentucky
Total Subsidies in Garrard County, Kentucky, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 365
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Garrard County, Kentucky totaled $1,306,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Gary W Clark | Paint Lick, KY 40461 | $5,122 |
42 | Mitchell Lamb | Paint Lick, KY 40461 | $5,075 |
43 | Phillip B Murphy | Lancaster, KY 40444 | $4,783 |
44 | William C Sutton Jr | Lancaster, KY 40444 | $4,755 |
45 | Larry Duggins | Lancaster, KY 40444 | $4,745 |
46 | Gary Shell | Lancaster, KY 40444 | $4,424 |
47 | Douglas West | Paint Lick, KY 40461 | $4,404 |
48 | Lucian Robinson | Danville, KY 40422 | $4,330 |
49 | Alejandra Magdalenn Munoz | Lancaster, KY 40444 | $4,301 |
50 | James K Fields | Berea, KY 40403 | $4,149 |
51 | Charlotte C Hunt | Lexington, KY 40509 | $4,142 |
52 | Charles Randall Ellis | Lancaster, KY 40444 | $4,032 |
53 | Jamie Mcqueen | Crab Orchard, KY 40419 | $3,999 |
54 | Myles E Hill | Paint Lick, KY 40461 | $3,918 |
55 | Bradley Michael Stuart League | Lancaster, KY 40444 | $3,795 |
56 | Chris Butner | Lancaster, KY 40444 | $3,717 |
57 | Edgeview Farms Inc | Lancaster, KY 40444 | $3,386 |
58 | William Kirby Teater | Lancaster, KY 40444 | $3,305 |
59 | Mr Marty Samuel Shepherd | Lancaster, KY 40444 | $3,180 |
60 | Larry A Sims | Lancaster, KY 40444 | $3,174 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”