Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Garrard County, Kentucky, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 365
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Garrard County, Kentucky totaled $2,238,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Sean Smith | Lancaster, KY 40444 | $2,970 |
142 | Durand Brown | Paint Lick, KY 40461 | $2,970 |
143 | Tristan Turner | Berea, KY 40403 | $2,970 |
144 | Paul Brogle | Lancaster, KY 40444 | $2,915 |
145 | Tim Miller | Lancaster, KY 40444 | $2,915 |
146 | David P Tirey | Lancaster, KY 40444 | $2,915 |
147 | Brandon Eugene Pingleton | Berea, KY 40403 | $2,915 |
148 | Thomas R Naylor | Lancaster, KY 40444 | $2,860 |
149 | Gulley Farm LLC | Lancaster, KY 40444 | $2,815 |
150 | Bobby E Adams | Lancaster, KY 40444 | $2,805 |
151 | Dustin Butner | Lancaster, KY 40444 | $2,805 |
152 | Jerry Carrier | Lancaster, KY 40444 | $2,750 |
153 | Philip Scott Bowman | Lancaster, KY 40444 | $2,750 |
154 | Rodney Montgomery | Lancaster, KY 40444 | $2,750 |
155 | Christopher Stephen Smith | Paint Lick, KY 40461 | $2,750 |
156 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $2,747 |
157 | John M Lamb | Paint Lick, KY 40461 | $2,695 |
158 | Deonica Asbery | Lancaster, KY 40444 | $2,640 |
159 | Jesse A Bray | Richmond, KY 40475 | $2,640 |
160 | Keith Lynn | Lancaster, KY 40444 | $2,640 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”