Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in McCracken County, Kentucky, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 158
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in McCracken County, Kentucky totaled $717,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Martin Athenas | Boaz, KY 42027 | $460 |
82 | Joe Kent Elliott | Paducah, KY 42001 | $454 |
83 | David Scoggin | Cadiz, KY 42211 | $453 |
84 | Julia Kinsey | Paducah, KY 42001 | $444 |
85 | Eugene P Brandt | Kevil, KY 42053 | $440 |
86 | Dianne Carter | Paducah, KY 42001 | $420 |
87 | Karen Street | Kevil, KY 42053 | $420 |
88 | H Dennis Myers | West Paducah, KY 42086 | $414 |
89 | Thomas E Turner | Kevil, KY 42053 | $400 |
90 | Michael Stone | Kevil, KY 42053 | $371 |
91 | Mr Donald Steven Peyton | Paducah, KY 42001 | $368 |
92 | Francis J Scheer | Paducah, KY 42001 | $352 |
93 | Parker Tilford | West Paducah, KY 42086 | $340 |
94 | Billie J Gregory | Paducah, KY 42003 | $340 |
95 | Betty Sanders | Paducah, KY 42001 | $325 |
96 | Jimmy Long | West Paducah, KY 42086 | $300 |
97 | James E Shaughnessy | Kevil, KY 42053 | $300 |
98 | Nancy L Alston | Corona Del Mar, CA 92625 | $280 |
99 | Wilma Bivin | West Paducah, KY 42086 | $275 |
100 | Barbara Mcgowan | Kevil, KY 42053 | $267 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”