Farm Subsidy information
McCracken County, Kentucky
Total Subsidies in McCracken County, Kentucky, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 1,832
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in McCracken County, Kentucky totaled $60,439,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | William F Baumer | Paducah, KY 42001 | $32,138 |
182 | Martha Rust | Paducah, KY 42001 | $31,952 |
183 | William M Moffitt | Kevil, KY 42053 | $31,881 |
184 | Mike Futrell | Paducah, KY 42001 | $31,705 |
185 | Ronnie Mobley | Paducah, KY 42001 | $30,997 |
186 | James W O'daniel Jr | Paducah, KY 42001 | $30,450 |
187 | Mark Owen Stewart | Paducah, KY 42001 | $30,266 |
188 | Pauline James | West Paducah, KY 42086 | $30,147 |
189 | James O Enlow Inc | Kevil, KY 42053 | $29,782 |
190 | B & T Farms | Kevil, KY 42053 | $29,682 |
191 | Blair Rudd | Bardwell, KY 42023 | $29,592 |
192 | Sherman Jones | West Paducah, KY 42086 | $29,451 |
193 | Edward H Hodges | Paducah, KY 42001 | $29,283 |
194 | Daniel G Athenas | Paducah, KY 42001 | $29,169 |
195 | C G Churchwell | Paducah, KY 42003 | $29,151 |
196 | First Community Bank Of The Heart ** | Clinton, KY 42031 | $28,871 |
197 | Wayne Rice | Kevil, KY 42053 | $28,638 |
198 | Hargrove Inc | Barlow, KY 42024 | $27,692 |
199 | John Ray Lamar Jr | Nicholasville, KY 40356 | $27,609 |
200 | Fay Hill | West Paducah, KY 42086 | $27,441 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”