Farm Subsidy information
Montgomery County, Kentucky
Total Subsidies in Montgomery County, Kentucky, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 299
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Montgomery County, Kentucky totaled $975,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Jeffery E Raney | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $1,666 |
102 | John H Kennon | Clay City, KY 40312 | $1,662 |
103 | Timothy A Triplett | Salt Lick, KY 40371 | $1,656 |
104 | John D Gabbard | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $1,625 |
105 | Roger Donathan | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $1,625 |
106 | Toulmin David Hubbard | Winchester, KY 40391 | $1,599 |
107 | Byron Dudley Craycraft | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $1,596 |
108 | Larry W Tipton | Jeffersonville, KY 40337 | $1,572 |
109 | Anthony L Ricketts | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $1,571 |
110 | Mike Earl Donaldson | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $1,560 |
111 | Roland T Cannon Jr | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $1,551 |
112 | Gloria Gayle Tipton | Mt Sterling, KY 40353 | $1,523 |
113 | Roger A Wilson | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $1,508 |
114 | Frank Hatfield | Sharpsburg, KY 40374 | $1,508 |
115 | Jason P Reffitt | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $1,506 |
116 | Linda Webb | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $1,490 |
117 | Collis Setters | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $1,482 |
118 | Yvette Rogers | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $1,456 |
119 | Gary Forrest Bowen | Stanton, KY 40380 | $1,448 |
120 | Aaron Marsee | Stanton, KY 40380 | $1,435 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”