Tobacco Payment Program in Montgomery County, Kentucky, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,099
Recipients of Tobacco Payment Program from farms in Montgomery County, Kentucky totaled $174,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Tobacco Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Barry T Mccoy | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $364 |
122 | Ned Tolson | Carlisle, KY 40311 | $362 |
123 | Janet Sargent | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $360 |
124 | Shirley Mccoy | Jeffersonville, KY 40337 | $356 |
125 | Wayne Pawley | Clay City, KY 40312 | $350 |
126 | Lena Jones Hart | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $345 |
127 | F M Sponcil | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $344 |
128 | Marjorie Cannon | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $340 |
129 | Nellie Cannon Est | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $340 |
130 | Sidney Ensor | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $335 |
131 | Charles Mason Orme | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $335 |
132 | William C Roland | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $331 |
133 | Grant Holbrook | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $329 |
134 | Willie E Hatton | Jeffersonville, KY 40337 | $328 |
135 | Louise Lee | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $324 |
136 | John Robinette | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $324 |
137 | Beverley Berger | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $323 |
138 | Arthur J Cole | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $322 |
139 | Oscar Richards Est | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $322 |
140 | Roland T Cannon Jr | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $322 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”