Conservation Reserve Program in Montgomery County, Kentucky, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 44
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Montgomery County, Kentucky totaled $601,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hubert Cole | Jeffersonville, KY 40337 | $8,458 |
22 | Philip Myers | Winchester, KY 40391 | $8,032 |
23 | Sidney Tipton | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $7,889 |
24 | W J Amburgey Est | Means, KY 40346 | $7,752 |
25 | James Berkley Mark | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $7,391 |
26 | D Edward Brown | Lexington, KY 40502 | $7,090 |
27 | Edward H Wilson | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $6,683 |
28 | Bonnie Myers | Winchester, KY 40391 | $6,031 |
29 | Edward C Stepanchuk | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $5,602 |
30 | Danny Halcomb | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $5,212 |
31 | Dorothy K Saunders | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $5,125 |
32 | Ella Sharon Sexton | Camden, OH 45311 | $4,917 |
33 | Linda Parsons | Oxford, OH 45056 | $4,917 |
34 | Thomas J Bigstaff III | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $4,204 |
35 | John R Neal | Mt Sterling, KY 40353 | $3,993 |
36 | Emerald Hills Farm | Winchester, KY 40391 | $3,360 |
37 | Arthur J Cole | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $3,288 |
38 | Anna Ruth Newkirk | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $2,527 |
39 | Frank Pitts | Tucson, AZ 85739 | $1,088 |
40 | Kadhim K Ali | Winchester, KY 40391 | $826 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”