Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Montgomery County, Kentucky, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 45
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Montgomery County, Kentucky totaled $12,775 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Earl M Reed | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $171 |
22 | Vernon Tipton Jr | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $164 |
23 | Jeanette Miller | Jeffersonville, KY 40337 | $154 |
24 | Lonnie Dale Anderson | Stanton, KY 40380 | $146 |
25 | O H Caudill Jr | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $131 |
26 | Oliver Willoughby | Jeffersonville, KY 40337 | $121 |
27 | James E Gabbard | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $112 |
28 | Edwin O Burden | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $102 |
29 | Daniel Corey | Jeffersonville, KY 40337 | $102 |
30 | Frances Layne | Jeffersonville, KY 40337 | $101 |
31 | Ricky Howard | Jeffersonville, KY 40337 | $98 |
32 | Morris A George | Jeffersonville, KY 40337 | $96 |
33 | William C Reffitt | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $89 |
34 | Zanna F Anderson | Stanton, KY 40380 | $82 |
35 | Gary Forrest Bowen | Stanton, KY 40380 | $65 |
36 | Barry Howard | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $57 |
37 | Wilma Jean Howard | Jeffersonville, KY 40337 | $54 |
38 | William Tandy Chenault | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $50 |
39 | David Reid Chenault | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $50 |
40 | William Wayne Gilvin | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $37 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”