Total Commodity Programs in Montgomery County, Kentucky, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 60
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Montgomery County, Kentucky totaled $262,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Michael Allen Havens | Sharpsburg, KY 40374 | $58,589 |
2 | Ireton Farms | New Richmond, OH 45157 | $47,340 |
3 | Michael O Murphy | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $31,695 |
4 | Christian M Mccarty | Mt Sterling, KY 40353 | $30,639 |
5 | Keaton S Mccarty | Mt Sterling, KY 40353 | $29,073 |
6 | Timothy A Triplett | Salt Lick, KY 40371 | $12,298 |
7 | James Berkley Mark | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $6,880 |
8 | William C Reffitt | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $6,276 |
9 | Morgan W Culbertson | Mt Sterling, KY 40353 | $4,018 |
10 | Robert H Amburgey Jr | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $2,926 |
11 | Christopher A Alderman | Sharpsburg, KY 40374 | $2,862 |
12 | Gary Forrest Bowen | Stanton, KY 40380 | $2,441 |
13 | Lonnie Dale Anderson Jr | Stanton, KY 40380 | $2,396 |
14 | Dudley Brent Wilson | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $2,376 |
15 | Charles Triplett | Mt Sterling, KY 40353 | $2,360 |
16 | Luciana L Alderman | Sharpsburg, KY 40374 | $1,967 |
17 | Donald R Oney | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $1,418 |
18 | Aaron Marsee | Stanton, KY 40380 | $1,369 |
19 | Thomas J Bigstaff III | Mount Sterling, KY 40353 | $1,257 |
20 | Sam Hunt | Means, KY 40346 | $1,213 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>