Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Ohio County, Kentucky, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 163
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Ohio County, Kentucky totaled $51,524 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Chelsea Geary | Beaver Dam, KY 42320 | $74 |
102 | Juanita Brown | Cookeville, TN 38506 | $73 |
103 | Donna Carden | Fordsville, KY 42343 | $73 |
104 | Barbara Ling | Philpot, KY 42366 | $70 |
105 | Tasha Karnes Johnson | Olaton, KY 42361 | $70 |
106 | Mary Pat Donlon | Hartford, KY 42347 | $69 |
107 | Mary Geiger | Brooklyn, NY 11217 | $66 |
108 | Nancy Givens | Horse Branch, KY 42349 | $66 |
109 | Rebecca Gaddis | Beaver Dam, KY 42320 | $66 |
110 | Sara Black | Hartford, KY 42347 | $64 |
111 | Jennifer D Woo | Owensboro, KY 42303 | $63 |
112 | Rita Calhoun | Lexington, KY 40509 | $63 |
113 | Edna Nantz | Hartford, KY 42347 | $61 |
114 | Betty Gilmore | Jacksonville, AR 72076 | $61 |
115 | Patricia A Brister | Saint John, IN 46373 | $59 |
116 | Nell Ferguson | Beaver Dam, KY 42320 | $56 |
117 | Anne Justus | Pittsford, NY 14534 | $56 |
118 | Julie King | Livermore, KY 42352 | $56 |
119 | Shelia Smith Sims | Beaver Dam, KY 42320 | $56 |
120 | Geneva May | Owensboro, KY 42301 | $55 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”