Total Commodity Programs in Powell County, Kentucky, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 702
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Powell County, Kentucky totaled $2,774,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Mary Lou Potts | Clay City, KY 40312 | $7,913 |
82 | Myers Arnett | Stanton, KY 40380 | $7,911 |
83 | David R Estill | Lexington, KY 40509 | $7,724 |
84 | Edward Stump | Clay City, KY 40312 | $7,637 |
85 | Patrick Michael Briggs | Stanton, KY 40380 | $7,621 |
86 | Roger Davis | Clay City, KY 40312 | $7,589 |
87 | Teronia Preece | Sharpsburg, KY 40374 | $7,411 |
88 | Hubert R Estes | Stanton, KY 40380 | $7,336 |
89 | Gail A Smith | Clay City, KY 40312 | $6,961 |
90 | William E Mccoy | Stanton, KY 40380 | $6,861 |
91 | Harold Tipton | Stanton, KY 40380 | $6,632 |
92 | Charles Manning Esate | Stanton, KY 40380 | $6,601 |
93 | Charles Endicott | Mt Sterling, KY 40353 | $6,601 |
94 | Thomas F Barnes | Clay City, KY 40312 | $6,525 |
95 | Seldon Skidmore | Stanton, KY 40380 | $6,508 |
96 | Roger Dean Tipton | Clay City, KY 40312 | $6,456 |
97 | Jesse Roberts | Winchester, KY 40391 | $6,441 |
98 | George Lee Drake | Stanton, KY 40380 | $6,197 |
99 | Lonnie Dale Anderson Jr | Stanton, KY 40380 | $6,165 |
100 | Richard E Bowlby Jr | Stanton, KY 40380 | $5,953 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”