Counter Cyclical Program in Warren County, Kentucky, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 932
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Warren County, Kentucky totaled $2,143,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Charles P Robertson | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $17,669 |
22 | Fred H Dunn | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $16,554 |
23 | Hudnall Farm Partnership | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $16,408 |
24 | Charles R Jones | Rockfield, KY 42274 | $16,313 |
25 | Maurice Heard | Rockfield, KY 42274 | $16,238 |
26 | Vanarsdale Farms Inc | Bowling Green, KY 42104 | $15,073 |
27 | William Boyd Ballance | Oakland, KY 42159 | $14,983 |
28 | Dale Tucker | Bowling Green, KY 42104 | $14,899 |
29 | Simon Bros | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $14,606 |
30 | Mary E Pearson | Oakland, KY 42159 | $12,938 |
31 | Wanda Mason | Bowling Green, KY 42104 | $12,740 |
32 | Sidney Thomas | Bowling Green, KY 42104 | $12,250 |
33 | Billy M Webb | Smiths Grove, KY 42171 | $11,822 |
34 | Dewayne L Fishburn | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $11,395 |
35 | Donald Elkin | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $11,136 |
36 | Harold V Smalling | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $10,860 |
37 | Jason Young | Bowling Green, KY 42104 | $10,843 |
38 | Larry Gravil | Bowling Green, KY 42103 | $10,812 |
39 | Victor W Smalling | Bowling Green, KY 42104 | $10,596 |
40 | Howard Stuart | Bowling Green, KY 42104 | $9,994 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”