Emergency Conservation Program in Warren County, Kentucky, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 109
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Warren County, Kentucky totaled $388,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Edward G Harlow Jr | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $591 |
62 | Donnie L Hayden | Smiths Grove, KY 42171 | $578 |
63 | Joanne S Brosche | Woodburn, KY 42170 | $563 |
64 | Robert A Halbman | Alvaton, KY 42122 | $563 |
65 | Tim Richards | Bowling Green, KY 42103 | $560 |
66 | Lissie M Daniel | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $550 |
67 | Gary Douglas Dickson | Woodburn, KY 42170 | $539 |
68 | Mark Young | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $522 |
69 | L E Smith | Bowling Green, KY 42103 | $518 |
70 | Charles R Davis | Bowling Green, KY 42104 | $496 |
71 | Larry Hagan | Williamstown, KY 41097 | $454 |
72 | Joe Don Estes | Rockfield, KY 42274 | $452 |
73 | George Billingsley | Bowling Green, KY 42103 | $448 |
74 | Don E Hughes | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $413 |
75 | Russell Justice | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $410 |
76 | Glendal Barrick | Smiths Grove, KY 42171 | $398 |
77 | Leroy James | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $395 |
78 | Michael L Hayes | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $384 |
79 | Manuel Dale Anderson | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $375 |
80 | Stewart Dye | Oakland, KY 42159 | $373 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”