Counter Cyclical Program in Warren County, Kentucky, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 932
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Warren County, Kentucky totaled $2,143,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | L E Walton | Woodburn, KY 42170 | $6,336 |
62 | Western Kentucky University | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $6,323 |
63 | Kenneth D Lowe | Smiths Grove, KY 42171 | $6,310 |
64 | Thomas D Tucker | Bowling Green, KY 42104 | $6,266 |
65 | Johnny F Pearson | Oakland, KY 42159 | $6,263 |
66 | Jason Clark | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $6,253 |
67 | Todd Webb | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $6,159 |
68 | James R Thomas | Smiths Grove, KY 42171 | $6,120 |
69 | Charles E Wilson | Smiths Grove, KY 42171 | $6,073 |
70 | Jerry L Willis | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $5,842 |
71 | Jackie K Young | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $5,788 |
72 | Mark A Thomas | Bowling Green, KY 42104 | $5,611 |
73 | Leon Tarter | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $5,568 |
74 | Derrick Paul Young | Bowling Green, KY 42103 | $5,551 |
75 | David Pelly | Smiths Grove, KY 42171 | $5,427 |
76 | County Of Warren Ky | Bowling Green, KY 42104 | $5,384 |
77 | James Edward Follin | Bowling Green, KY 42104 | $5,377 |
78 | Robert P Donoho | Bowling Green, KY 42103 | $5,149 |
79 | James J Westbrook | Alvaton, KY 42122 | $4,968 |
80 | Jimmy Brooks | Smiths Grove, KY 42171 | $4,956 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”