Counter Cyclical Program in Warren County, Kentucky, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 932
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Warren County, Kentucky totaled $2,143,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Herbert Smith Jr | Bowling Green, KY 42103 | $3,774 |
102 | Don E Hughes | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $3,756 |
103 | Joyce Collins | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $3,729 |
104 | James G Lyles | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $3,689 |
105 | James M Jenkins | Pembroke, KY 42266 | $3,673 |
106 | Betty Hunt | Bowling Green, KY 42104 | $3,642 |
107 | George P Devore | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $3,595 |
108 | Joe Eddie Pendleton | Bowling Green, KY 42103 | $3,595 |
109 | Kenneth Pendleton | Bowling Green, KY 42103 | $3,595 |
110 | A Franklin Berry Jr | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $3,525 |
111 | Hendrick Farms | Smiths Grove, KY 42171 | $3,496 |
112 | Ronnie D Thomas | Smiths Grove, KY 42171 | $3,445 |
113 | Joe Frank Duncan | Rockfield, KY 42274 | $3,383 |
114 | Rickey L Baxter | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $3,299 |
115 | Alan G Sumner | Smiths Grove, KY 42171 | $3,283 |
116 | Joshua Lee Duvall | Oakland, KY 42159 | $3,272 |
117 | Maurice D Hill | Oakland, KY 42159 | $3,255 |
118 | The Kenneth L Pierce Jr Living Tr | Franklin, TN 37067 | $3,145 |
119 | Danny Ray Davenport | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $3,135 |
120 | Gordon T Howell | Bowling Green, KY 42104 | $3,093 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”