Counter Cyclical Program in Warren County, Kentucky, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 932
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Warren County, Kentucky totaled $2,143,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Johnny Wayne Deel | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $1,998 |
182 | Kenneth O Hendrick | Bowling Green, KY 42103 | $1,986 |
183 | Stephen Young | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $1,948 |
184 | J M Hardcastle | Bowling Green, KY 42103 | $1,942 |
185 | William R Hullett | Rockfield, KY 42274 | $1,942 |
186 | Janell Hill | Woodburn, KY 42170 | $1,933 |
187 | David Allen Faxon III | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $1,921 |
188 | Jemmie Clark | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $1,914 |
189 | Charles R Ground | Smiths Grove, KY 42171 | $1,888 |
190 | Benigno Garcia | Bowling Green, KY 42103 | $1,882 |
191 | Rocky Shaw | Scottsville, KY 42164 | $1,872 |
192 | Angie Yadon | Bowling Green, KY 42103 | $1,867 |
193 | Jim Minton | Bowling Green, KY 42103 | $1,859 |
194 | Joan Creek | Bowling Green, KY 42104 | $1,852 |
195 | Dwyane Furlong | Smiths Grove, KY 42171 | $1,849 |
196 | D B Bewley | Scottsville, KY 42164 | $1,812 |
197 | R W Bewley | Scottsville, KY 42164 | $1,812 |
198 | Joseph P Stewart | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $1,812 |
199 | Effie Honaker | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $1,790 |
200 | Wanda Dowell | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $1,784 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”