Market Gains in Warren County, Kentucky, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 46
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Warren County, Kentucky totaled $802,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Triple Oaks Farms | Bowling Green, KY 42104 | $289,017 |
2 | Hunt Farms Ptr | Bowling Green, KY 42102 | $271,196 |
3 | Bill Jenkins | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $36,648 |
4 | Jenkins Farm Partnership | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $31,132 |
5 | Jimmie Wilson | Smiths Grove, KY 42171 | $18,140 |
6 | Donald Elkin | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $17,203 |
7 | Dennis G White | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $16,648 |
8 | Jerry L Willis | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $13,184 |
9 | Jerry R Hudnall | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $9,549 |
10 | Hudnall Farm Partnership | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $9,522 |
11 | Terry W Young | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $9,428 |
12 | Tommy Poteet | Brownsville, KY 42210 | $8,945 |
13 | William Larry Hays Estate | Bowling Green, KY 42103 | $7,979 |
14 | George T Willis | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $7,108 |
15 | Joe Lane Willis | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $6,578 |
16 | Robert L Mathews | Alvaton, KY 42122 | $5,824 |
17 | Ronald Kinser | Bowling Green, KY 42103 | $5,047 |
18 | Jackie K Young | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $3,839 |
19 | Billy R Young | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $3,348 |
20 | Marie Alford | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $3,012 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>