Market Loss Assistance Program in Warren County, Kentucky, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,247
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Warren County, Kentucky totaled $4,896,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Vanarsdale Farms Inc | Bowling Green, KY 42104 | $37,544 |
22 | J Mark Chapman | Bowling Green, KY 42104 | $36,857 |
23 | Simon Bros | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $34,976 |
24 | Charles R Jones | Rockfield, KY 42274 | $34,617 |
25 | Dennis G White | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $33,969 |
26 | Darrell Dickerson | Woodburn, KY 42170 | $32,779 |
27 | Jenkins Farm Partnership | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $32,588 |
28 | Merrill Stuart | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $32,521 |
29 | George T Willis | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $32,418 |
30 | David W Dickerson | Bowling Green, KY 42104 | $31,200 |
31 | Todd Dickerson | Woodburn, KY 42170 | $31,200 |
32 | Fred H Dunn | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $30,372 |
33 | L E Walton | Woodburn, KY 42170 | $30,299 |
34 | Basham Farms | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $30,252 |
35 | Larry Gravil | Bowling Green, KY 42103 | $29,887 |
36 | Tim Elkins | Smiths Grove, KY 42171 | $29,695 |
37 | Hudnall Farm Partnership | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $28,460 |
38 | Western Kentucky University | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $26,743 |
39 | Billy Thomas | Bowling Green, KY 42104 | $26,591 |
40 | David Herrington | Bowling Green, KY 42101 | $26,179 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”