Farm Subsidy information
Woodford County, Kentucky
Total Subsidies in Woodford County, Kentucky, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,774
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Woodford County, Kentucky totaled $30,071,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | William E Gaines | Versailles, KY 40383 | $226,470 |
22 | W Gary Wilson | Versailles, KY 40383 | $225,308 |
23 | Billy Slatten | Versailles, KY 40383 | $219,034 |
24 | Terry Boyd | Versailles, KY 40383 | $217,099 |
25 | Bobby Gaffney | Versailles, KY 40383 | $211,244 |
26 | Gary Hippe | Frankfort, KY 40601 | $207,824 |
27 | Michael T Mitchell | Midway, KY 40347 | $199,238 |
28 | Bryan K Richardson | Versailles, KY 40383 | $194,665 |
29 | Wayne Baker | Versailles, KY 40383 | $189,075 |
30 | John M Mitchell | Midway, KY 40347 | $186,676 |
31 | Brookstown Farm Inc | Versailles, KY 40383 | $179,196 |
32 | Hargus Sexton | Lexington, KY 40508 | $175,456 |
33 | Donald Mitchell | Midway, KY 40347 | $164,630 |
34 | Campbell Graddy | Versailles, KY 40383 | $156,207 |
35 | Jones Partnership | Versailles, KY 40383 | $155,638 |
36 | James L John D & Thomas Kay Ptr | Versailles, KY 40383 | $155,626 |
37 | Gary Varner | Midway, KY 40347 | $154,671 |
38 | David H Lloyd | Versailles, KY 40383 | $154,102 |
39 | Darrell Varner | Midway, KY 40347 | $153,468 |
40 | Hargus Sexton G A Inc | Lexington, KY 40508 | $146,974 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”