Total Conservation Programs in Louisiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 17,248
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Louisiana totaled $553,125,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Linwood Partnership | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $1,003,232 |
22 | Green Gold Company | Independence, LA 70443 | $995,409 |
23 | Biedco Corporation | Monroe, LA 71211 | $964,190 |
24 | Thom Enterprises Inc | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $957,957 |
25 | The Teal Partnership L P | Monroe, LA 71201 | $955,090 |
26 | Butts Family Limited Partnership | New Braunfels, TX 78130 | $926,380 |
27 | Sprague Pltn Inc | Tallulah, LA 71284 | $924,917 |
28 | C & G Of Winnsboro Inc | Monroe, LA 71201 | $917,508 |
29 | Charles Richard Brown | Tallulah, LA 71284 | $917,012 |
30 | Wetlands Inc | Ruston, LA 71273 | $903,248 |
31 | Oliver Mcmickens | Alexandria, LA 71303 | $881,719 |
32 | Rodney And Dania Hutchins | Harrisonburg, LA 71340 | $874,299 |
33 | Roseland Pltn LLC | Ferriday, LA 71334 | $859,915 |
34 | Francis Thompson | Delhi, LA 71232 | $854,256 |
35 | T Ranch Inc | Tallulah, LA 71282 | $852,297 |
36 | Bird LLC | Ridgeland, MS 39157 | $840,402 |
37 | Dale H Steckler | Natchez, MS 39120 | $831,973 |
38 | Larry Wilkinson Crawford Testamentary Trust | Clayton, LA 71326 | $830,944 |
39 | R M Wemple Realty Inc | Shreveport, LA 71105 | $826,194 |
40 | Dupree Tractor Inc | Coushatta, LA 71019 | $818,996 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”