Farm Subsidy information
Louisiana
Total Subsidies in Louisiana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 18,284
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Louisiana totaled $316,959,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | F & M Vargas Nursery LLC | Forest Hill, LA 71430 | $405,123 |
42 | Tensas State Bank ** | Tallulah, LA 71284 | $401,722 |
43 | Advanced Agriculture Inc | Lafayette, LA 70598 | $399,882 |
44 | Mark Mcleod Farms | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $397,726 |
45 | Doug Young Nursery, L.l.c. | Forest Hill, LA 71430 | $390,453 |
46 | Basile State Bank ** | Basile, LA 70515 | $382,162 |
47 | Clark Farms Joint Venture | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $380,992 |
48 | H E Harper Farms | Cheneyville, LA 71325 | $369,284 |
49 | Canezaro Brothers Farms LLC | New Roads, LA 70760 | $355,285 |
50 | Hmc Farms LLC | New Iberia, LA 70563 | $347,794 |
51 | Sugarland Acres LLC | Youngsville, LA 70592 | $334,315 |
52 | Ben Merrick Farms LLC | Lettsworth, LA 70753 | $331,342 |
53 | Knott's Farm Inc | Arnaudville, LA 70512 | $323,668 |
54 | Mz Growers Partnership | Simmesport, LA 71369 | $322,904 |
55 | B & A Cane Inc | Bunkie, LA 71322 | $322,856 |
56 | P.d. Deshotels Farms | Plaucheville, LA 71362 | $322,788 |
57 | Powell Farm Partners | Lake Charles, LA 70615 | $322,198 |
58 | Supreme Rice, LLC | Crowley, LA 70526 | $320,435 |
59 | A & M Farm Inc | New Iberia, LA 70560 | $319,213 |
60 | Harang Sugars LLC | Donaldsonville, LA 70346 | $316,791 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”