Counter Cyclical Program in Louisiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 30,047
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Louisiana totaled $635,828,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | David & Dot Vanderlick | Lecompte, LA 71346 | $773,888 |
82 | Russell & Mary Edith Stacy Farm | Natchitoches, LA 71457 | $765,564 |
83 | James & Carolyn Arceneaux Farms | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $756,256 |
84 | M L Farms | Oak Ridge, LA 71264 | $751,563 |
85 | Russell Y Ratcliff Jr Ptshp | Saint Joseph, LA 71366 | $747,632 |
86 | Dba Miller Brothers Farm/ Randy Mark Becky Gayla | Epps, LA 71237 | $746,023 |
87 | Thornton Farms | Transylvania, LA 71286 | $734,042 |
88 | Boyd Holley Farms | Bastrop, LA 71220 | $720,534 |
89 | Shepard Planting Co | Oak Ridge, LA 71264 | $718,827 |
90 | Islington Plantation | Tallulah, LA 71282 | $717,301 |
91 | Bertis & Brenda Ray | Jonesville, LA 71343 | $716,798 |
92 | Collins Ag Partnership | Tallulah, LA 71282 | $711,794 |
93 | Charles R & Angie S Yerby Dba Key | Colfax, LA 71417 | $706,806 |
94 | Moore Farm Partnership | Bastrop, LA 71220 | $704,380 |
95 | Bringol Planting Partnership | Wisner, LA 71378 | $691,518 |
96 | Howard Millikin Farm | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $691,148 |
97 | W E Holloway Farms | Delhi, LA 71232 | $689,588 |
98 | Kelly Farms | Collinston, LA 71229 | $689,042 |
99 | C & C Farms Partnership | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $688,032 |
100 | C & S Farms | Pioneer, LA 71266 | $677,624 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”