Conservation Reserve Program in Louisiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 9,877
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Louisiana totaled $512,447,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | James Rodney Hutchins | Harrisonburg, LA 71340 | $592,836 |
82 | W Elton Kennedy | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $591,714 |
83 | J Wayne Mcknight | Tallulah, LA 71282 | $590,043 |
84 | Tom C Mcintosh | Jonesboro, AR 72404 | $587,018 |
85 | Robert & Cecilia Manning III | Ferriday, LA 71334 | $586,830 |
86 | Delta Bank ** | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $583,818 |
87 | Bret C Beard | Natchez, MS 39120 | $583,773 |
88 | Wb Lake LLC | Columbia, LA 71418 | $583,531 |
89 | Paul Rosenzweig Jr | Augusta, GA 30907 | $579,747 |
90 | Black Gold Farms Inc | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $579,283 |
91 | Pamela G Mccalister | Natchitoches, LA 71457 | $577,445 |
92 | Rickey C Mccalister | Natchitoches, LA 71457 | $577,441 |
93 | Jon David Mceacharn | Tallulah, LA 71284 | $576,873 |
94 | Wade M Scott | Fort Mill, SC 29715 | $569,219 |
95 | Taliaferro Estate Farms | Jena, LA 71342 | $564,787 |
96 | J L And J N Donnell Inc | Winnsboro, LA 71295 | $562,768 |
97 | Reeves Children LLC | Jonesville, LA 71343 | $557,728 |
98 | Bethard Corporation | Coushatta, LA 71019 | $555,790 |
99 | Chicago Mill & Lumber Co | Winnsboro, LA 71295 | $555,583 |
100 | Coy And Hutchins | Harrisonburg, LA 71340 | $550,016 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”